News Trumperteers claims no credit for any images/videos featured on this site unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyright to it’s respectful owners(links). News Trumperteers is in no way responsible for or has control of the content of any external web site links. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies;News Trumperteers does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site’s content. If you own rights to any of the images, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact News Trumperteers via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. email: News Trumperteerss@gmail.com
When an institution sets out to ban something, more often than not the thing they choose to ban simply reflects back on that institution’s way of thinking
So what does it tell us about the Oxford University Press that they are banning authors from using words that refer to pigs?
Yes, you read that correctly. Oxford UP is prohibiting authors from using the words pig, pork, sausage, or other pig-related words because they are afraid of offending Jewish or Muslim readers who consider pigs and pork to be off-limits for religious reasons.
Now, I can understand how Oxford UP would perhaps consider editing out a photo of someone stuffing their face with bacon in a manuscript where another photo could equally serve a purpose, but to eliminate all references to pigs is absurd.
Cutting out references to an entire species of animal isn’t an example of careful editorializing to avoid offending a particular group of people who don’t believe in eating that animal. What it is, however, is an example of removing language, information, and accuracy from a book to cater to the beliefs of another.
While freedom of press and speech may be a uniquely American ideal, it is absolutely wrong to impose a ban on a subset of information. No matter how hard Muslims or Jews try to imagine it, pigs are a species that exist on planet Earth. Not talking or writing about them isn’t going to make them disappear.
Furthermore, the issue begs the question whether any Muslim or Jew was actually offended by references to pigs and pork in works published by Oxford UP. Was the publishing house receiving an inordinate number or complaints due to depictions and references to a species of animal?
Diyanet is the highest religious authority in Turkey and the final authority in interpretation of Islam. It controls the country’s 85,000 mosques.
Recently the authority issued a fatwa – an interpretation of Islamic rules – which created intense debate.
To a question from a believer, Diyanet replied that from an Islamic view it had no impact on a marriage “if a father kisses his daughter with lust.”
It was also, according to Diyanet, no sin “if the father looks at his daughter and feels lust.” The daughter must, however, “be over nine years old.”
This fatwa comes shortly after another fatwa from Diyanet, which said that engaged couples should not hold hands, because it could lead to other things, things that are haram (illegal) in Islam. In some countries it could even give grown men a reason to pick up stones and throw them at the couple until they are dead.
Put the two latest fatwas together and it gives a view of sexuality in Islam that is completely unreal and disgusting seen with Western eyes.
“Regrettable error in translations”
The fatwa naturally triggered a storm of outrage online, so much that the page where the fatwa had been was removed. But it is still in circulation, as people have saved it.
He is mayor of Asotthalom, Hungary, a small town that borders Serbia.
During the refugee crisis, thousands poured in across the unprotected border.
.
At first glance, the video looks like a Hollywood thriller. Set to strident, aggressive music, it shows a group of muscular men using motorbikes, helicopters and even horses to race across the countryside in pursuit of human quarry.
By Andrew Malone
When the targets are captured, they are wrestled to the ground and their hands bound as the patrol members, in camouflage clothing, stand menacingly over them.
But the ‘narrator’ whose voice can be heard over these chilling scenes is not a highly-paid movie star. He is, in fact, a provincial politician, and his message is unequivocal: ‘Hungary is a bad choice for migrants.’
He’s been true to his word. His team of bounty hunters have caught hundreds of immigrants trying to make it into Hungary, on the way to neighbouring Austria and beyond, on the so-called Balkan smuggling route. The man’s name is Laszlo Toroczkai, a charismatic 45-year-old mayor who has made it his life’s work to prevent what he calls the destruction of his country.
Disturbingly, his views are increasingly being echoed by his compatriots.
Mayor Toroczkai is in charge of a small Hungarian town called Asotthalom, on the border with Serbia — a nation still outside the EU — which was pitched into the centre of the refugee crisis in 2015, when thousands of immigrants started pouring across the unprotected border each day.
The crisis erupted after Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, announced to the world that Europe would welcome refugees, prompting more than one million to head to Germany alone, while hundreds of thousands of others made for Britain, France and Italy.
With locals in Asotthalom — a traditional farming town with a population of 5,000 — finding groups of immigrants sleeping in their gardens and outbuildings, and others watching aghast as thousands streamed through the centre of the village on their way through Europe, the mayor decided enough was enough.
He has introduced a zero-tolerance policy against all migrants, saying that the very future of Europe is at stake because of people he calls Muslim ‘invaders’ and ‘future terrorists’, and has vowed to stop this movement of people.
‘It is very important for the village to preserve its traditions,’ he says. ‘We can see large Muslim communities in western Europe that haven’t been able to integrate — and we don’t want to have the same experience here.’
He has announced new rules for the town he runs, and wants the rest of Hungary to follow suit, banning the building of mosques, making the Muslim call to prayer illegal, and banning the burqa and the ‘burkini’ swimsuit. He says the measures are key to preventing Muslims ‘causing fear, alarm and shock among the locals’.
There is no doubt that millions of his fellow countrymen share his distaste for migrants. The most obvious manifestation of this is the forbidding wire fence — dubbed the new ‘Iron Curtain’ by some — that now stretches 110 miles along the border with Serbia.
American esteems call for the affirmation of far more Muslim outcasts, introduced huge identify liberal Angelina Jolie at an Islamic celebration on Monday in Virginia. The Hollywood face on the UN’s exile Corporation, she joined Secretary of Condition John Kerry in pushing for your resettlement of a massive amount of Muslim displaced people from the US. No thought of option territorial resettlement choices for Middle Jap or African outcasts was made by possibly Jolie or Kerry.
Conveying Muslim exiles to the US realizes American esteems, guaranteed Jolie. Ahead of a Generally Muslim group of onlookers, she surrounded the UN’s outcast commitment as an activity in philanthropy. The event was facilitated through the All Dulles Space Muslim Society (ADAMS), a subsidiary of the Islamic Culture of North America (ISNA), which happens to be affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Angelina Jolie with John Kerry addressing journalists on the Division of State on Monday
Angelina Jolie: Islam Is ‘Beautiful Religion’; People in america MUST Consider In Muslim Refugees Mainly because it’s Their ‘Obligation’
American esteems demand the affirmation of far more Muslim outcasts, introduced large identify liberal Angelina Jolie at an Islamic situation on Monday in Virginia. The Hollywood facial area with the UN’s exile Corporation, she joined Secretary of Condition John Kerry in pushing to the resettlement of an enormous number of Muslim displaced individuals from the US. No considered alternative territorial resettlement solutions for Center Eastern or African outcasts was made by both Jolie or Kerry.
Conveying Muslim exiles to the US realizes American esteems, guaranteed Jolie. Ahead of a for the most part Muslim group of onlookers, she surrounded the UN’s outcast commitment as an action in philanthropy. The celebration was facilitated because of the All Dulles Region Muslim Society (ADAMS), a subsidiary of your Islamic Modern society of North The us (ISNA), which can be linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Angelina Jolie with John Kerry addressing journalists on the Section of State on Monday
“It can be our commitment as People in america to make a rustic that respects These acquiring clear of affliction,” reported Jolie. “Escaping their households not by conclusion but alternatively in light of the fact that it can be important for their survival. An wonderful America is often a merciful America.”
Unfit “differing traits” fortified The united states, asserted Jolie.
“After we are at our most grounded, it truly is The purpose at which we attract on our differing attributes like a men and women to discover solidarity in light-weight of our ordinary esteems and our greater persona,” proclaimed Jolie. “We’re not strong in spite of our variances, we’ve been solid as a result of it.”
Recasting Islamic psychological oppression as “rough radicalism,” Jolie conveyed an undefined expression instituted through the Obama Administration Together with the conclude objective of denying the marvel’s ideological and spiritual measurements.
Information From Other Channel:
Refugees are Adult men, Women of all ages and youngsters caught inside the fury of war, or the cross hairs of persecution. Much from getting terrorists, they are frequently the victims of terrorism themselves.
I’m proud of our region’s background of offering shelter to probably the most vulnerable persons. Americans have lose blood to defend the concept that human legal rights transcend lifestyle, geography, ethnicity and faith. The decision to suspend the resettlement of refugees to The us and deny entry to citizens of 7 Muslim-vast majority nations continues to be achieved with shock by our friends world wide precisely for that reason record.
The global refugee disaster plus the risk from terrorism ensure it is fully justifiable that we think about how greatest to safe our borders. Each federal government will have to equilibrium the demands of its citizens with its Worldwide obligations. But our response have to be calculated and may be based on points, not panic.
Given that the mom of 6 young children, who have been all born in foreign lands and so are happy American citizens, I greatly want our country to generally be Harmless for them, and all our nation’s small children. But I also need to know that refugee children who qualify for asylum will normally have a chance to plead their case to your compassionate The usa. And that we can manage our protection devoid of crafting off citizens of overall nations — even infants — as unsafe to go to our place by advantage of geography or religion.
It is solely not real that our borders are overrun or that refugees are admitted to America without near scrutiny.
Sigh, if it’s not one Muslim Democrat, it’s the other.
This week, at a Detroit fundraiser for the Michigan Coalition for Human Rights, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) said that her supporters should join her in a hunger strike that would pressure Washington to abolish the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. Tlaib said that the dismantling of the agency, which is responsible for identifying and deporting illegal immigrants, should be of central concern to progressives who want justice for every American resident.
“It’s going to take movements outside the halls of Congress,” Tlaib told the audience. “I want you all to shut them down, we can shut them down. Don’t wait for this Congress to act, shut them down. I know what they’re going to say, they’ll go, ‘What do you mean Rashida?’ Well I’ll tell you. There are some people that are using hunger strike, all these other things, going to the border, and I plan to.”
There’s no word yet on whether or not Tlaib has begun her strike or, indeed, when she plans on beginning the fast. There is also no word on whether or not her colleagues on Capitol Hill care enough about Tlaib’s nutritional needs to make this protest successful. But we’re sure she’ll get plenty of adoring media coverage for it, if she ever gets up the gumption to start.
If Tlaib is looking to drum up support for abolishing ICE within the Democratic Party, she might be getting off on the wrong foot. In her speech, she reserved plenty of criticism for her party colleagues, complaining that the leadership in Congress was too “strategic.” We take that to mean that Tlaib (much like her fellow freshmen Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar) are more concerned with making a bunch of ineffective noise than actually getting things done. They would rather see their faces on the cover of Time magazine than pass legislation. Which, frankly, is probably for the best.
The other thing that makes Tlaib similar to AOC and Omar – nothing is ever their fault and they are always the victim in any given scenario. Just listen to the way Tlaib talks about how the rest of her colleagues view her on the House floor.
“Honestly, I’ve never felt more Palestinian than I feel in Congress,” she said. “Even in Palestine, when I’m visiting my grandmother, I’m American to the Palestinians. But I’m more Palestinian in the halls of Congress than I am anywhere in the country, in the world.”
Everyone play a tiny violin for Tlaib and her friends. They don’t feel welcome.
Back in 2013, then-CBS reporter Lara Logan published an investigative report on the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that was buried and “discredited,” reportedly due to the network’s mistaken vetting of one eyewitness’s account of the incident.
However, according to former CBS reporter Logan, the report was disparaged because it was critical of the Obama administration’s failure to come to the defense of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and his compound when it was attacked by Islamist terrorists.
Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the attack on September 11, 2012.
In a recent interview with Mark Levin of Fox News Channel’s “Life, Liberty and Levin,” the host asked Logan about the Benghazi investigative report that ultimately resulted in her leaving CBS.
“Well, I will say this, there’s a lot more to that story than anybody knows,” Logan said. “But one of my favorite things to hear is all these media reporters and propagandists standing up and saying, ‘That wasn’t being politically targeted. That was a failure of journalism.’”
“Okay, so that’s the biggest joke of all,” she continued, “because there was not a failure of journalism in that story. It’s not good journalism that these propaganda groups weren’t out there. They’re not targeting you because they’re worried about the standard of your reporting. They’re targeting you — their stated objective — is that they’re going to eliminate anything that they view as a threat to their political ideology.”
“What they were trying to do was bury the substance of that story,” she added.
Lara Logan went on to describe the horrific moment when ambassador Stevens and others realized that “the cavalry” wasn’t coming to help them.
“Greg Hicks, Chris Stevens’ deputy, looked at us on ’60 Minutes’ and he said what he had said on ‘the Hill’ but it was much more powerful in our cameras when he said that he asked the defense attache, just a few minutes into that attack, if the cavalry was coming. The defense attache looked at him … [Hicks was] the last person to speak to Chris Stevens. When Chris Stevens was under attack, a terrorist attack in his compound, he called Greg Hicks. Greg Hicks looked at the defense attache and he said, ‘well?’ [The defense attache responded] ‘I’m sorry, Greg, the cavalry ain’t coming.’”
She continued, “Greg Hicks said, ‘I felt sick in the pit of my stomach because those of us who go out on the end of the line for our country, we believe our country has our back,’ and in that minute, in that moment, I knew they didn’t.”
She said Hicks looked at the defense attache and stated, “We better tell the boys at the annex.”
“Two of those boys died that night,” she said.
“That was an Al Qaeda terrorist attack that was extremely well-planned, timed for the 10th Anniversary of 9/11,” concluded Logan. “Those things, the substance of our reporting, is what the Obama administration and the progressive political movement, and Hillary Clinton’s propaganda force … that’s what they wanted buried, because it didn’t suit them politically to have the truth out about that.”
Talking about the way she and her crew did was discredited on the Benghazi reporting, Logan said, “They picked the least important person in the story. They took two things he said and they cast it into doubt. It was called into question and then they made the story disappear.”
Logan said there had to be some serious digging to discredit her story.
“There was a lot of other significant reporting in there. Think of all those people trying to tear that piece to shreds and they were only able to cast doubt over two things one guy of the three characters had to say,” she said.
Lara Logan claims she was silenced over something that didn’t ultimately matter that much to the overall story.
“The lesson I learned is that they’re not going to come after you for the things that matter. They’re going to come after you and use the things that don’t matter and they’re going to use that to bury the whole thing and silence you,” she said.
Obama and Clinton were covering up weapons sales...they had gotten caught, they were burying the evidence...they intended to bury all the witnesses too. But our boys fought hard and brought them home...I am curious where their allegiance lies now.
