Search This Blog

This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Showing posts with label Progressive Movement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Progressive Movement. Show all posts

A Muslim soldier says her command sergeant major forced her to remove her hijab

Sgt. Cesilia Valdovinos was at a chapel at Fort Carson, Colorado, for a suicide prevention briefing on March 6 when she says her command sergeant major grabbed her by the arm, took her outside and made her remove her religious head covering in front of others.
The senior noncommissioned officer believed that Valdovinos, 26, who has an approved exemption from her brigade commander to wear a hijab in uniform, was wearing her hair out of regulations underneath it, she told Army Times on Tuesday.
“To me, it was the same thing as if they had asked someone to take their top off,” the soldier, a member of the 704th Brigade Support Battalion, said.
No one had asked her whether her hair was in a regulation bun, she added, before demanding that she remove the garment.
She took off the scarf portion of the covering first, she said, but Command Sgt. Maj. Kerstin Montoya demanded she completely expose her hair. When she removed the cap underneath, which covers her hairline and underneath her chin, the length of hair came loose from its bun.
The battalion adjutant, who accompanied Valdovinos and Montoya for the inspection, says that the senior NCO tapped the sergeant on her shoulder before leading her outside of the chapel.
“Upon removing her hijab it was evident her hair was completely down,” Capt. Brooke Smith said in a statement. “CSM Montoya told her to get her hair back in regulation and not let it happen again. At no point did CSM Montoya touch the soldier or yell at her (at all or within earshot of other soldiers).”
Valdovinos claims her hair was tied up under the hijab. The under-cap has an extra length of fabric inside, she explained, that she wraps around her bun to secure it before pulling the cap down. That’s why her hair came loose when she removed it, she said.
It was the first time since receiving her waiver that the soldier had ever been confronted about her hijab, she said. But not the first she felt targeted as a Muslim in the Army.
In an Equal Opportunity complaint filed on March 7, she said, she described her first sergeant referring to her as “the girl with the hood.” A culinary specialist, she said, she was recently reassigned from an on-post dining facility to her battalion’s headquarters company after objecting to cooking pork products.
And previously, she added, she reported to her company commander that while deployed last year, another soldier referred to her as a terrorist. The captain did not escalate the claim, she said.
“I take all reports of soldiers disrespecting another soldier’s religious beliefs, observances, or traditions very seriously,” Col. David Zinn, the 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division commander who signed Valdovinos’ exemption memo, said in a statement. “There is currently an inquiry regarding Sgt. Valdovinos’ claim. I will ensure our unit continues our tradition of placing a high value on the rights of our soldiers to observe the tenets of their respective religions or to observe no religion at all.”
The inspection was a blatant act of Islamophobia, according to the head of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, which represents Valdovinos.
“Unless this CSM, who wretchedly denigrated our MRFF client by ordering her to take off her hijab in public, enjoys the extraordinary powers of X-ray vision, it would have been impossible for this CSM to have even seen the hair of our MRFF client,” Mikey Weinstein said in a statement.
The under-cap is an integral part of the approved hijab, he added.
“I wish they would just ask me if they have questions,” Valdovinos said.


DO YOU AGREE WITH ROBERT REDFORD’S STATEMENT THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP IS THE TRUE LEADER OF AMERICA?


We all know that the majority of Hollywood celebrities are liberals who hate President Trump. However, it seems that the era of the awful Hollywood brainwashing factory is coming to an end, with more and more celebrities waking up and taking a massive stand against liberal nonsense. 




One of the most influential celebrities in the world – Robert Redford has publicly supported and endorsed the president Donald Trump and his policies.

Redford spoke about his disappointment with the division which is present in the countries across the USA. He believes that the situation was never worse and that there were times when it was possible for two sides to work together. Unfortunately, it seems that today it is 





impossible and Robert said he feels sad about it. As a serious person, Redford believes that the people of America should support their current president and get together once again.




   The famous actor also mentioned that things have changed drastically since the Watergate scandal which took place in 1972 during Nixon’s presidency, reports The Sports Hall. 




Also, he made a comparison between the current American leader and Nixon, whose presidency lasted from 1969 to 1974.   




“IT LOOKS LIKE A LOT OF THINGS ARE GOING TO BE TRIED TO BE TAKEN AWAY FROM US, AND I THINK WHAT THAT’S GOING TO DO IS GALVANIZE THE PEOPLE,” REDFORD SAID. “THOSE PEOPLE WHO WEREN’T INTERESTED OR FIGURED, ‘WHY, WHO CARES?’ 
\




ARE NOW GOING TO REALIZE THEY’RE DIRECTLY AFFECTED AND ARE NOW GOING TO STEP UP. I THINK IT’S GOING TO BE FOLLOWED BY A MOVEMENT, AND A MOVEMENT IS GOING TO GO AGAINST WHATEVER CHOICE IS MADE TO CUT THINGS AWAY. … I THINK THAT’S VERY, VERY HEALTHY.”





 DO YOU SUPPORT OUR PRESIDENT ? SHARE THIS UP !  YES YES YES ! 

SOURCE : PEEENOISE

ВRЕAKING NEWS : Тrump`s Removеѕ Мuslim Fеderal Јudge Fоr Тrying Тo Implеment Ѕharia Lаw In Аmeriсa. Do you support ?





22nd Circuit Court of Appeals Justice Hansam al Alallawalahi-Smith stood out as truly newsworthy this week when he upset a decision out of Dearborn, Michigan. The decision permitted two basic and fierce principles of Sharia Law to be rehearsed here in the United States. 


At the point when inquired as to why the feds reserve the privilege to enable a man to brutalize his better half to talk with another man and to pound the life out of her about if she somehow managed to follow up on her driving forces, the judge referenced the methodical imbuement proviso and said the Sharia Law ought to be permitted in light of the fact that the fourteenth Amendment promises them the rights ensured by different states. Those laws might be worthy to savages, however here in America, we have higher norms. 


Alallaha-Smith noticed that the fourteenth Amendment doesn't really prohibit outside impact from being permitted by law, refering to the Christmas Holiday for instance: 


"CHRISTMAS IS A CHRISTIAN HOLIDAY EXCLUSIVELY, YET IF YOU'RE A MUSLIM AND YOU WANT TO GO ABOUT YOUR DAY WITHOUT BEING BOTHERED YOU CAN'T BECAUSE THE LAWS OF A CITY IN A CITY IN ROME TAKE PRECEDENT OVER THE 1ST AMENDMENT, WHICH GUARANTEES NO STATE SPONSORED RELIGION. A FEDERAL CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY IS JUST THAT.

WITH THAT AS PRECEDENT, UNDERSTANDING THAT A HIGHER COURT MAY REVERSE IT, MY DECISION IS THAT ITEMS ONE AND TWO ON THE DOCKET ARE ALLOWABLE BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS AS PRESCRIBED BY SHARIA LAW." 


"President Trump utilized an old point of reference and an official request to expel al Allalawaralahali-Smith from the seat, refering to net carelessness of his obligations and wanton negligence for the United States Constitution, reports As American As Apple Pie. 


Democrats can't quit whining over this, guaranteeing since the arrangement wasn't Trump's,

he can't utilize the point of reference to flame him. Trump reacted that individuals dependably need him to consider the Office in these circumstances. His solitary explanation was, 


"THE OFFICE HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO LET HIM GO FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY." 

Graham angers Dems by digging into Clinton, Obama controversies






© The Hill Graham angers Dems by digging into Clinton, Obama controversiesNew tensions are flaring on the Senate Judiciary Committee over plans by newly minted Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to dig into Obama-era scandals.

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer
Graham, a close ally of President Trump's, has outlined several areas he wants to probe now that he has the Judiciary Committee gavel.
They include the FBI's handling of its investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant applications targeting former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), asked about Graham's plans, started laughing and compared them to the "thrilling days of yesteryear."

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


"This is going to be like the History Channel it turns out. Instead of taking a look at the current issues, Lindsey Graham wants to go back and answer important questions about the Bermuda Triangle and Hillary Clinton," Durbin told The Hill.
Durbin said he was "concerned" about Graham's plans but quipped that "you know there is that question about Jimmy Carter which he probably wants to ask."

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), another member of the panel, said maybe Graham should "investigate Benghazi some more too" - an apparent reference to a years-long House probe that Democrats considered a political stunt.
Graham's plans come while tensions on the panel linger from the deeply partisan fight over Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation.
Graham won praise from conservatives during that battle, when he exploded at Democrats during the hearing and accused them of trying to "destroy this guy's life" after sexual assault allegations surfaced against Kavanaugh.
Graham has seesawed in the Trump era from moderate deal-maker to firebrand ally for the president, who remains popular in South Carolina. Graham is up for reelection in 2020.

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


He has cut deals with Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, including helping to draft legislation with Sens. Christopher Coons (D-Del.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) that would protect special counsel Robert Mueller from being fired without "good cause." The White House and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) oppose that bill.
Graham has also worked closely with Durbin on immigration reform in another break with Trump and has been hustling behind the scenes to try to reach an agreement that would end the weeks-long partial government shutdown.

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


Coons, a member of the Judiciary Committee, encouraged Graham to thread the needle carefully, adding that "it depends how divisive partisan topics are approached."
"It is possible for the Judiciary Committee to remain a highly functional committee even while tackling controversial topics," Coons said. Asked if he was saying Graham should focus on more bipartisan areas first, he added that "I think that would be a more constructive way to start, I'll simply put it that way."

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


Democrats are now pushing for the committee to dig into an explosive BuzzFeed News report that former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen told Mueller that Trump personally directed him to lie after his election about the timing of when the negotiations involving a Trump Tower project in Moscow ended in an effort to obscure the president's involvement.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) sent a letter to Graham on Friday asking him to call Cohen to testify before the committee.

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


"Our committee must conduct a thorough investigation of the President's involvement in these crimes and whether he obstructed justice to hide them. ... The hour to put country before petty partisan differences has come," he added.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), the top Democrat on the panel, added in a statement, without directly mentioning Graham, that Republicans should "join in a bipartisan effort to get the facts to the American people, who deserve to know the full story of what happened during and after the 2016 election."

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


Graham has aligned himself closely to Trump on some key areas within the panel's jurisdiction.
He's promised he'll use the Judiciary Committee to clear the president's conservative judicial picks. And he's committed the panel to digging into issues at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI that Trump publicly pressured former Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate.

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


Graham told reporters earlier this month that he would do a "deep dive into the FISA issue" as chairman of the Judiciary Committee. And he told Fox News last month that he believed the FBI "phoned in" the Clinton probe and were "in the tank" for the Democratic presidential nominee.
"There's a certain unevenness here about how you investigate campaigns," Graham said, adding that he believed there was "100 percent" a double standard between how the bureau handled the investigation into Clinton compared to investigating the Trump campaign.

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


Graham also said late last year that he would "totally" investigate the FBI's handling of its investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and Clinton's email. He added separately last month that he would "get to the bottom of" the FISA warrant applications against Page and that he wanted to have "an in-depth discussion" with former FBI Director James Comey.
Asked about his investigation plans and the criticism from Democrats, a spokeswoman for Graham pointed to a pair of tweets from the GOP senator on Friday where he doubled down.

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


Graham described as "stunning" a Fox News report that Justice Department official Bruce Ohr discussed his views on a controversial research opposition dossier on Trump with individuals now on special counsel Robert Mueller's probe.
"These purported revelations will NOT get a pass in Senate Judiciary Committee," Graham added.

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


Graham's investigations could overlap with work by the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is deep into its own probe of the 2016 election. The two panels previously bumped elbows under Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), with both demanding to hear from Comey and meet with Mueller.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), a member of both panels, acknowledged that there had previously been a "jurisdictional battle" between the two committees, but said that oversight of the Justice Department and FBI was in the Judiciary Committee's lane.

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer


"The Senate Judiciary Committee has oversight responsibility for the DOJ and the FBI and so I think oversight hearings ... could be useful," he said.
He added that "as long as it's focused on oversight of those institutions, the FBI and DOJ, it's clearly in the Judiciary Committee's jurisdiction ... [But] there's no question that sometimes there's tension between those two."

CNN to be sued for more than $250M over 'vicious' and 'direct attacks' on Covington High student: lawyer